Mirror, mirror on the platform ...
What can an architect do with the ±¬×ߺÚÁÏ buildings ... change their morphology? Impossible: each building's height, footprint, volume and organization is determined by the processes it harbours. Coat the buildings with colours? Possible, but risky: what blends nicely into the environment at noon under a bright summer sun may look dull and depressing under the cold November rain.
"We faced an interesting problem," says architect Simon Pallubicki, a partner at ENIA, the firm chosen in 2009 to work on the exterior architecture of the ±¬×ߺÚÁÏ installation. "The buildings on the platform were extremely heterogeneous in terms of functionality, size and construction mode; commonly used architectural parameters like regularity and alignment were absent."
The architects at ENIA, a Parisian firm specialized in multiple architectural domains, were presented with a double challenge: how to lend unity to apparent architectural disorder and how to integrate the project harmoniously into the surrounding landscape.
Architecture is as much about functionality as it is about aesthetics: the metal cladding will also enhance the insulation qualities of the buildings' "skin."
While they were working on the architectural project, Simon Pallubicki and his colleagues spent a lot of time hiking and driving around the site. "We did a lot of reconnaissance work, sometimes close by, sometimes as far as 40-50 kilometres from the platform to evaluate the visual impact of the installation."